Losing the 'social origins' of the English Civil War or Revolution

I often begin my mornings by browsing the internet and social media sites to see what new items have appeared on subjects in which I am interested. By chance, I came across a post by Susan D.Amussen on Facebook enquiring in May, 2014 about the disappearance of books on the origins of the events in the 1640s in England covering both the social origins and the political history of the country during these tumultuous events. (Her post can be found here together with a number of comments from historians mainly based in the U.S.A.) This phenomenon derives from the supersession of the economic and social determinism of Tawney and Stone after the 'revisionist' response in the mid-1970s. By 1990, the latter was itself a spent stream of analysis. I am not a determinist of any kind but I do not entirely rule out the possibility that economic and social changes prior to 1640 did contribute to the 'grand soulevements' as I prefer to call it in England and Wales (if not in Scotland and Ireland). Many years ago, in the 1950s, W.R.Emerson and J.P.Cooper postulated an argument to the effect that the position of the larger landowners improved strikingly after 1580: I suspect that their insight has a degree of truth in it and that it may be possible to develop it further.