Christopher Hill's private view of Conrad Russell

 

Richard Cobb to Hugh Trevor-Roper. 7th February, 1988

"For once Dr Hill and you are in agreement. The former has little respect for the new Earl's scholarship and told us that he was a fraud. That was when we [Balliol College] elected Pennington [in 1965 as Hill's successor as a Fellow in History]. Well, of course, Merton [College] too occasionally turns out a Monster....


'The new Earl' who was disparaged by Christopher Hill was Conrad Russell, son of Bertrand the philosopher. Pennington who beat him for the vacant Balliol Fellowship was Donald Pennington."

My Dear Hugh, Letters from Richard Cobb to Hugh Trevor-Roper and others. Edited by Tim Heald (Frances Lincoln Publishers. London. 2011. Pages 166, 167)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Simon Healy has died

Image
  I am extremely sorry to report that Simon Healy, who worked for the History of Parliament Trust's 1604-1629 section for many years,  has died. I remember him as a very cheerful and engaging conversationalist. My condolences go to his widow and their two children.
Read more

Centre and Locality: review reflections

  Quite by chance, I was browsing on Twitter last Friday (9 th April) when I spotted on Edward Vallance’s site a reference to a video conference organised by William Clayton of the University of East Anglia at the end of last month. Further searches led me to William Clayton’s review of the book edited by Chris Kyle and Jason Peacey, Connecting Centre and Locality: Communication in early modern England, which appeared under the auspices of the Manchester University Press in 2020 and which Clayton had reviewed for The Seventeenth Century in its most recent issue. [1] This is a subject which interests me and I did give some thought to responding to William Clayton’s largely laudatory comments. However, I was also conscious that I had not read this collection of essays and was thus less well equipped than I should be for assessing either the book or William Clayton’s review. There was, however, one historiographical issue upon which I did feel qualified to comment. Right at the st...
Read more

Call for Papers: IHR conference on 'Corruption and Scandal in the Early Modern World, 1500-1800' (pasted)

  CFP: Corruption and Scandal in the Early Modern World, 1500-1800 5th and 6th June 2025 Institute of Historical Research, Senate House, London Scandals and instances of corruption shock and delight, and are recurring themes in political and institutional spheres. Reactions to these events shape politics, and provide key insights into the socio-religious and political outlooks of the societies in which they take place. In the early modern period, the meanings of scandal and corruption extended beyond our modern understanding of these terms. Concentrating on 1500-1800 - a time of religious, political, and social development and upheaval - this interdisciplinary conference seeks to explore various instances, responses to, and perceptions of scandal and corruption across Europe and the wider world. Through this event, we seek to explore specific examples of scandal and corruption, reflect upon these terms in their broadest senses, including religious, political,...
Read more