Reviews in the TLS (4 September, 2020)


Reviews in the TLS and elsewhere

The Times Literary Supplement (4 September, 2020) is of greater interest this week. It contains a review of Sir Noel Malcolm’s recent book on the Ottoman Empire by Margaret Meserve of the University of Notre Dame in the USA. The work evidently covers the respect Europeans felt after 1450 for Turkish arms, for the civic virtues – charity, sobriety and order – underpinning Ottoman society and the contrast its power posed to  Christian practices. It is, perhaps, a little surprising that Meserve did not comment on the degree to which Ottoman rulers encouraged men of low social origins, often converts from Christianity, to rise on the basis of their talents. Malcolm was nonetheless clear on the hostility of Catholics and Protestants to Muslim beliefs and on the willingness of European states to seek diplomatic or military alliance with Ottoman rulers. Even so, Europeans found themselves obliged to reflect on Ottoman Turkey in a range of ways during the period to 1750.[1]

The other interesting piece in the TLS was an edited version of Theodore Rabb’s 1977 review of the translation of Lucien Febvre and Henri-Jean Martin’s work, The Coming of the Book, first published in French in 1958. Ted Rabb was, by then, someone I had known for almost a decade, initially through a shared interest in the affairs of the Virginia Company of London and the career of Sir Edwin Sandys. Rabb was a cosmopolitan figure, born in Czechoslovakia, educated at the University of Oxford and established at Princeton University in the USA. He was a man and scholar of considerable self-confidence and a wide understanding of early modern European history. His review reflected on the profound influence of Febvre and the Annales School on post-1945 historiography and the failure to translate their major works into English. Febvre and Martin had been more interested in improvements in the quality of paper than in technical breakthroughs in printing. Publication of older conservative works acceptable to religious and secular authorities actually inhibited the production of new ideas in their view. But printing was essential to the spread of the Reformation and the use of vernacular languages. Printing had been shaped by intellectual concerns rather than the other way around. Since 1958, work on the history of mentalities, especially of the lower orders, had been stimulated in France and in the USA through the studies of Elizabeth Eisenstein, Robert Darnton and Natalie Zemon Davis. Overall, Rabb concluded that printing could now be seen in a richer context.[2]

Sadly, Theodore Rabb passed away in January, 2019. But it was good to see his confident analysis and to hear echoes of his distinctive voice once again.
                                                                                                                                  5th September, 2020



[1] The Times Literary Supplement. No.6127 (4 September, 2020), page 13.
[2] Ibid. page 34.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding out about what is going on in early modern history beyond this country

Simon Healy has died

Centre and Locality: review reflections