Lawrence Stone and the historiography of the 'gentry controversy'
  LAWRENCE STONE AND THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE GENTRY CONTROVERSY The  controversy over the economic and social origins of the English  Revolution was a topic that excited ferocious debate over sixty years  ago. Historians of the calibre of R.H.Tawney and Hugh Trevor-Roper,  J.P.Cooper, Christopher Hill and Lawrence Stone advanced radically  different interpretations to explain the violent events of the 1640s and  1650s in the British Isles. American scholars, most famously of all,  J.H.Hexter, like Willson Coates, Harold Hulme, Judith Shklar and Perez  Zagorin also commented with varying degrees of sharpness on the issues  at stake. But only one of the major participants, Lawrence Stone,  offered an account of the historiography of the dispute, first of all in  his introduction to the anthology of academic articles and documentary  sources entitled Social Change and Revolution in England 1540-1640 which he edited in 1965 and then, in slightly revised form, in Chapter 2 of his work...
A Ph.D. studentship is available on this project dealing with 'Global Commodities in Early modern wills. Details can be found at https://www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DGE603/phd-studentship-global-commodities-in-early-modern-wills-a-leverhulme-trust-funded-phd-studentship-in-the-department-of-archaeology-and-history#:~:text
ReplyDelete